| |
Newsletter Archive
To Subscribe to the Newsletter Click here
| August 2002 Biobased Fuels, Power and Products Newsletter
|
| |
Contents:
Feature Article: Controversial Additive, MTBE, is Gradually Phased Out by States
On the Hill
Grassroots
Market Place
Events
Solicitations
R&D Awards
|
Feature Article
 |
| |
Controversial Additive, MTBE, is Gradually Phased Out by States
On January 1, 1995 the federal Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) program was developed to help reduce urban ozone pollution.
The federal RFG program required the use of 2.0 weight percent of oxygen sold in the gasoline in these designated areas.
The program was implemented in metropolitan areas that had the worst urban ozone pollution. Other locations voluntarily
joined the program in an effort to improve air quality.
As a result of the RFG program, many producers began to blend MTBE into their gasoline. MTBE (Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether) is an oxygenate
additive that is used in the reformulation of gasoline and improves air quality. According to the Oxygenated Fuels Association, use of MTBE
has a number of benefits including the fact that it can be blended at the refinery. Once it is blended, the reformulated gasoline
can be shipped through the pipelines and exchanged readily within the distribution network.1
MTBE has been quite successful in fighting air pollution,2 however, controversy over the additive began
when MTBE was detected in drinking water in certain parts of the country. For example, MTBE was discovered in wells in Santa
Monica and South Lake Tahoe in 1996 and 1997.3 Although the health risks associated with
MTBE in drinking water are still unknown, the high cost and difficulty in cleaning MTBE leakages has forced many states to
pass or draft legislation to ban or limit the use of MTBE.4
Currently, there are seven states that have enacted to ban MTBE: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois,
Michigan, and Missouri. All but Colorado have established time frames in which to phase out MTBE. The only full ban
of MTBE already in effect is in Colorado.5
In addition to the seven states enacting bans on MTBE, ten states have restricted the use of MTBE.
These include: Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, South Dakota, and Washington.
Among these, New York and South Dakota prohibit the sale of gasoline containing MTBE, but continue to allow MTBE
to be used in other applications. Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio and Washington
have moved to limit the volume percent of MTBE allowed to be reformulated into their gasoline. Table 1 shows
the status of individual state restrictions. Six other states have legislation pending. They are: Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey, and Rhode Island.6
Currently, 15% of the areas requiring RFG/oxy-fuel oxygenate use ethanol. These areas tend to be in the Midwest,
in close proximity to ethanol production facilities. As the number of states banning or limiting MTBE increases,
more opportunities will open for ethanol producers. According to the Renewable Fuels Association, fuel-ethanol is
the most likely substitute due to its positive impact on air quality and fuel performance. Ethanol's characteristics
pose minimal water quality risks because it is easily degraded. Ethanol also poses minimal health effects making
it a viable replacement fuel additive.7
MTBE proponents claim that replacing MTBE with ethanol will increase the cost of gasoline due to low ethanol
supplies coupled with the high cost of transporting the ethanol. Proponents also believe that the ethanol
infrastructure is not adequate to produce and distribute the quantities of ethanol that will be needed to replace MTBE.
They add that ethanol could be expensive as a fuel additive because it cannot be mixed at the refinery. It has to be
transported by truck or rail (emitting harmful emissions into the atmosphere) to the distribution facilities where it is
blended, and it cannot be transported by pipeline.8 A study performed by Stillwater
Associates for the California Energy Commission on the impact of the MTBE phase out in the state estimated that it would
cause a 5%-10% shortfall of the state's gasoline supply and that gasoline would jump to $3 a gallon. These concerns led
Governor Davis of California to extend the effective MTBE phase-out date from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003.9
The ethanol industry refutes these arguments by pointing out that ethanol is currently marketed and distributed in
every state in the U.S. and that if ethanol were to replace MTBE nationwide, ethanol would be shipped by barge or rail
cost competitively. Ethanol proponents also state that there would be no transportation impediment to the use of ethanol
as a replacement of MTBE.10 Moreover, studies performed by the state of California on
the environmental and health effects of ethanol found that it has benefits over MTBE in terms of water contamination and
"no substantial effects on public health impacts of air pollution."11
In responding to supply concerns, ethanol proponents are quick to point to the increase in ethanol
production capacity over the last several years.12 Currently, there are 63
ethanol plants in 20 states in the U.S. The domestic ethanol industry set an annual production record
of 1.77 billion gallons in 2001, up 20 percent from 1.47 billion gallons in 1999. Current U.S. fuel
ethanol capacity is about 2.4 billion gallons per year, and 460 million gallons of capacity are under
construction in five states including Iowa, Michigan, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.13
Table 1
States That Have Acted to Ban or Restrict MTBE Use
| State |
Action |
Effective Date |
| Arizona |
Phase out MTBE. |
Effective no later than 180 days
following California's MTBE
ban |
| California |
Phases out MTBE completely. |
12-31-03 |
| Colorado |
Phases out the use of MTBE. |
Effective |
| Connecticut |
Phases out the use of MTBE. |
10-01-03; Legislation is pending
to delay the ban until 2005 |
| Illinois |
Phases out the use of MTBE. |
07-24-04 |
| Indiana |
Prohibits sale of gasoline containing more than one-half of
one vol. % MTBE. |
07-23-04 |
| Iowa |
Prohibits the sale of gasoline containing more than 2 vol.%
MTBE. |
Effective |
| Kansas |
Prohibits sale of gasoline containing more than 0.5 vol.%
MTBE. |
Effective 07-01-04. Dependent
upon waiver from EPA |
| Kentucky |
Prohibits sale of gasoline containing more than 0.5% MTBE by
volume, beginning 1/1/06. Beginning 1/1/04, encourages all RFG
sold in the state to contain ethanol in place of MTBE. |
Signed 4-23-02. Becomes
effective 01-01-06. |
| Michigan |
Phases out the use of MTBE. |
06-01-03 |
| Minnesota |
Prohibits the sale of gasoline containing more than 0.3 vol. % MTBE, ETBE, TAME. No amount of MTBE can be used to meet
the state's oxygenate requirement. |
Effective |
| Missouri |
Prohibits the use of MTBE. |
Effective 07-01-05 |
| Nebraska |
Prohibits the sale of any petroleum product containing more
than 1 vol.% MTBE. |
Effective |
| New York |
Prohibits the sale of gasoline containing MTBE. |
01-01-04 |
| Ohio |
Prohibits the sale of gasoline containing more than 0.5% vol.
MTBE. |
07-01-05 |
| South Dakota |
Prohibits sale of gasoline containing MTBE. |
Effective |
| Washington |
Phases out the use of MTBE, stating MTBE not be intentionally
added to any gasoline, motor fuel or clean fuel produced for sale
or use in the state and in no event may MTBE be present in
gasoline above six-tenths of one percent by volume. |
12-31-03 |
Source: Renewable Fuels Association
1. Oxygenated Fuels Association www.ofa.net/whatmtbe.htm
2. McCarthy, James E. and Tiemann, Mary. MTBE in Gasoline: Clean Air and Drinking
Water Issue Congressional Research Services, Resources, Science, and Industry Division, May 15,
2001, Summary.
3. White Environmental Association www.calgasoline.com/back.htm
4. McCarthy, James E. and Tiemann, Mary. MTBE in Gasoline: Clean Air and Drinking
Water Issue Congressional Research Services, Resources, Science, and Industry Division, May 15,
2001, pg.7
5. Renewable Fuels Association
6. Ibid
7. National Govonors Association, Natural Resources Policy Studies Division "The National
Debate About The Gasoline Additive MTBE." Located at the following web address:
www.nga.org/cda/files/19991112MTBE.PDF
8. Oxygenated Fuels Association www.ofa.net/OFAPR01-31-01.htm
9. The Oilspot News, California MTBE Ban Delayed, Volume 7, Issue 12, March 20, 2002
10. Renewable Fuels Association www.ethanolrfa.org/leg_position_mtbe.shtml
11. California Air Resource Board, Water Resources Control Board, and Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessments. Health and Environmental Assessment of the Use of
Ethanol as a Fuel Oxygenate. Report to the California Environmental Policy Council in Response to
Executive Order D-5.-99. Dec. 1999 Volume 1, Executive Summary. P, 26. Report available at
Internet web site: www-erd.llnl.gov/ethanol/etohdoc/
12. Renewable Fuels Association www.ethanolrfa.org/leg_position_gasprices.shtml
13. Renewable Fuels Association, 2002 Ethanol Industry Outlook.
|
| |
BACK TO TOP |
| |
Biomass Spotlight: California
 |
| |
 Of the almost 13,000 MW of installed biopower capacity in the United States, about 8 percent is present in California,1 and concentrated mostly in two areas - the Central Valley and the Northern California Forests.2 Biopower is generated from four main sources: timber (wood) residues, landfill gas, agricultural residues, and municipal solid waste. Timber residues account for the largest percentage of California's biomass power generation capacity at 43 percent (433MW). Landfill gases fuel power plants as well, and account for 34 percent, or 339 MW, of the state's biomass capacity. Crop and processing residues from the agriculture industry are used to generate 14 percent, or 139 MW, of California's biopower capacity. Another major source of biopower comes from municipal solid waste (MSW), which supplies 9 percent of the total production capacity. MSW also has great promise1; Californians generate 33 million tons of MSW each year.3
A number of incentives exist as part of the state's continued efforts to increase biomass usage for power. Governor Gray Davis has offered $11 million in grants to encourage farmers to take part in the conversion of agriculture biomass to energy.4 The Landfill Gas Electricity Generation Incentive is making $622,500 available to the owners of landfills who choose to use the gas emitted to produce electricity.5 Last year, the 13-state Western Regional Biomass Energy Program chose three biomasst-to-energy projects located in California. These are: testing and certification of a soybean or vegetable oil/ diesel fuel blend; an information system to help assess forest biomass in Plumas County; and monitoring of an anaerobic bioreactor at a regional landfill. California is also a part of a multi-state effort to develop a small, modular generator able to use a variety of biofuels to produce electricity.6
40,000,000 gallons of gasoline are sold each day in California.7 As in other states, MTBE (Methyl Tertiary-Butly Ether) has been used to comply with the Clean Air Act oxygenate requirements. In 1999, Governor Davis signed Executive Order D-5-99 requiring California to eliminate all MTBE from its gasoline by December 2002 - the ruling was later extended to December 2003. This extension allows time to bring in oxygenates, such as ethanol, into California's gasoline markets. The extension provides an opportunity for the fuel-ethanol industry to help the state meet its oxygenate requirements. Currently, California's fuel-ethanol production capacity is around 9 million gallons each year.8 Phillips Petroleum Company recently removed all MTBE from its 76 brands of gasoline, which affects 1,500 locations statewide. ExxonMobil announced its plans to replace MTBE with ethanol by early 2003, still - almost one year ahead of the governor's schedule.
1 US Department of Energy. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Network. Renewable Electric Plant Information System (REPiS). www.eren.doe.gov/repis/
2 Renewable Energy Policy Project and the Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology. Renewable Energy for California. www.repp.org/articles/static/1/binaries/repp_calrenew_2002.pdf
3 California Energy Commission. Landfill Gas Powerplants. www.energy.ca.gov/development/biomass/landfill_gas.html
4 Governor Davis Celebrates National Agriculture Day. Press Release, March 20, 2002.
5 California Energy Commission. Landfill Gas Electricity Generation Incentive. 38.144.192.166/peakload/landfill_gas_electricity.html
6 Western Regional Biomass Energy Program. Seven Biomass Energy Projects in California, Colorado, Idaho, Nebraska and South Dakota to Share More Than $300,000. www.westbioenergy.org/bioprjcts01.htm
7 Energy Information System. Transportation Fuels, Prime Suppliers in California. www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/oilsales_trans/oilsales_trans_ca.html
8 Renewable Fuels Association. Growing Homeland Energy Security. www.ethanolrfa.org/outlook2002.html |
| |
| BACK TO TOP |
| |
On the Hill
 |
| |
| Congress is considering a number of bills that affect the use
of biomass resources to produce energy and biobased products. For more information, visit
thomas.loc.gov/ |
| |
| Bill # |
Sponsor
|
Summary |
Last Action |
H.R. 4 |
Rep. W. J. (Billy) Tauzin (Republican - LA) T: (202) 225-4031 |
SAFE Act of 2001 works to enhance energy conservation and research and development and provide for security and diversity in the energy supply for the American people. |
6/27/2002:Conference held. |
S. 2678 |
Max Baucus (Democrat - MO) T: (202) 224-2651 |
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to transfer all excise taxes imposed on alcohol fuels to the Highway Trust Fund, and for other purposes. |
6/25/2002:Introductory remarks on measure.(CR S6025-6026) Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. |
|
| |
BACK TO TOP |
Grassroots
 |
| |
|
California Law Reduces Automobile Pollution
Governor Gray Davis signed into law new regulations that make greenhouse gas emission
standards stricter. The California Air Resources Board will have the power to set
"maximum" but "economically feasible" emissions standards. These standards must be
set by 2005 and must be met by all automobiles sold by 2009. While these regulations
will be set only for California residents, they represent ten percent of the national market,
so the law will affect all American consumers. Groups opposed to the new law say that it will
raise car prices and limit consumer choices.
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41533-2002Jul21.html
EarthShell Packaging® Now Available in Select West-Coast Wal-Marts
Ninety Wal-Mart Stores in Washington, Oregon and Northern California will begin to carry
EarthShell Packaging® plates and bowls. This follows successful test
marketing in Maryland and Oregon. EarthShell® products are made from potato starch
and natural limestone. The packaging biodegrades when exposed to moisture and can be used
as part of compost, making it much more environmentally friendly than traditional polystyrene foam packaging.
www.earthshell.com
Biomass Plant to be Built in Los Angeles
Alchemix Technologies and Environmental Strategies & Technologies International, Inc.
(ESTI) have signed a letter of intent for a joint venture to build an electrical
generating plant in Los Angeles. This plant will use garbage, waste products,
tires and other biomass as a fuel. The plant will use Alchemix's HydroMax technology
to convert the biomass into low-cost hydrogen or electricity. The letter of
intent also states that each year a new plant will be built over the next five years.
www.alliancecorp.ws/ESTTAlchemixLOI.htm
"76" Stations Provide MTBE-free Gasoline
California '76' brand petroleum stations announced on July 22, 2002 that they are
the first to provide MTBE-free gasoline year round in all of its retail outlets in California.
'76' was also the first retailer to blend ethanol into their gasoline. The announcement
comes a year and a half before the deadline to remove MTBE from gasoline in California.
http://www.phillips66.com/newsroom.
www.phillips66.com/newsroom
Dung-Fired Power Plant Opens
The first dung-fired power plant opened in Britain July 18, 2002.
The plant uses the excrement from 5,000 cows to light up homes on the north coast of Devon.
The dung, called slurry, comes from 28 local dairy farms and is fermented for 20 days
to produce methane for the plants gas-fired generators. After the slurry has been
fermented, it is treated to remove tuberculosis and foot-and-mouth spores and
returned to the farms as fertilizer.
www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=humannews&StoryID=1218779
Call for Papers: Journal of Industrial Ecology
The Journal of Industrial Ecology, an international peer-reviewed journal
owned by Yale University and published by MIT Press, is soliciting papers
for a special issue on the sustainability of bio-based materials.
http://www.yale.edu/jie/cfpbiobased.htm
|
| |
BACK TO TOP |
Market Place
 |
| |
 |
|
Data Sources:
OxyFuel News: Ethanol (U.S. Avg: Terminal);
MTBE (Houston, TX: spot);
Gasoline
(Gulf Coast: spot, regular grade)
USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service, "Agricultural Prices," "Grain Stocks"
|
| |
| |
| Grain Prices |
July 2001 |
July 2002 |
% Change |
Corn Prices ($/bushel) |
1.88 |
2.07 |
0.10% |
| Soybean Prices ($/bushel) |
4.46 |
5.5 |
0.23% |
|
| Fuel Supply |
July 2001
|
July 2002 |
% Change |
| Motor Gasoline Production ('000 b/d) |
8641 |
8550 |
-1.05% |
Motor Gasoline Imports ('000 b/d)
|
681 |
808 |
18.65% |
*Motor Gasoline Stock (Mil. bbl)
|
168.33 |
165.48 |
-1.69% |
| Refinery Utilization Rate |
96 |
93.4 |
-2.71% |
|
| Fuel Production |
June 2001
|
June 2002 |
% Change |
*Ethanol Production ('000 b/d) |
110 |
124 |
12.73% |
*MTBE Production ('000 b/d) |
234 |
232 |
-0.85% |
|
|
Data Sources: U.S. DOE-Energy Information Administration, "Petroleum Supply Monthly" USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service, "Agricultural Prices," "Grain Stocks"
*Please note: Units used for fuel data have been revised to correct an error in previous editions.
|
| |
| BACK TO TOP |
Events |
August 5-6, 2002 Traverse City, MI | Advanced Power Technology Forum www.mbs2002.org |
August 12-16, 2002 Istanbul, Turkey | World Conference and Exhibition on Oilseed and Edible, Industrial and Specialty Oils www.aocs.org |
August 21-23, 2002 Prior Lake, MN | NCGA North Central Distillers Grains Conference www.ncga.com |
August 25-27, 2002 Singapore | World Fuels Conference: Asia 2002 www.afdc.doe.gov/cgi-bin/comingevents/events.cgi?biofuel |
September 9-12, 2002 Ft. Lauderdale, FL
| HyFuSys1 - International Fair and Conference - Commercial Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Systems for Stationary, Automotive and Portable Applications www.fair-pr.com |
September 9-13, 2002 Guidestone Farm Loveland, CO
| Biodiesel Fuel Workshop www.fair-pr.com |
| Click
here for additional bio-related
events. |
| |
| BACK TO TOP |
Solicitations |
| Title: |
Continuing Solicitation for the Office of Science |
| Description: |
U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science is seeking grant applications for support of basic energy science fundamental research in the natural sciences and engineering leading to new and improved energy technologies and to understand and mitigate the environmental impacts of energy technologies. |
| Government Agency: |
U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science |
| Schedule: |
Applications may be submitted at any time |
| URL: |
www.science.doe.gov
|
|
|
|
| Title: |
Small Business Innovation Research Program |
| Description: |
U.S. Department of Agriculture is seeking grant applications from small businesses for the purpose of supporting high-quality research proposals containing advanced concepts related to important scientific problems and opportunities in agriculture that could lead to significant public benefit if the research is successful. |
| Government Agency: |
U.S. Department of Agriculture |
| Schedule: |
Phase I proposals due August 30, 2002 |
| URL: |
www.reeusda.gov |
|
|
|
| Title: |
Advanced Technology Program |
| Description: |
The ATP is a competitive cost-sharing program designed for the Federal government to work in partnership with industry to accelerate the development and broad dissemination of challenging, high-risk technologies that offer the potential for significant commercial payoffs and widespread benefits for the nation. |
| Government Agency: |
U.S. Department of Commerce |
| Schedule: |
The ATP has established the following three due dates for submission of proposals: Monday, June 10, 2002; Wednesday, July 31, 2002; and Monday, September 30, 2002. To be considered for funding in fiscal year 2002, potential proposers must submit their proposals by the first due date of June 10, 2002. Proposals submitted after June 10, 2002, may not be considered for funding in fiscal year 2002, but rather for funding in fiscal year 2003, subject to the availability of funding. |
| URL: |
www.atp.nist.gov |
|
|
|
| Title: |
Value-Added Agricultural Product Market Development Grants |
| Description: |
Competitive grant funds for fiscal year 2002 to help independent agricultural producers enter into value-added activities. |
| Government Agency: |
US Department of Agriculture, Rural Business-Cooperative Service |
| Schedule: |
Applications must be submitted to the appropriate State USDA Rural Development office no later than 4:00 pm on August 8, 2002. |
| URL: |
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/vadg.htm |
| | |
R&D Awards
 |
| |
| There are no R&D Awards for this issue. |
| |
|
| |
|