Bioamss Initiative Newsletter

Feature Article June 2006
High Crude Oil Prices & Petroleum Products in the U.S. and the Biofuels Solution

Michael Manella
BCS, Incorporated

Prices for crude oil and petroleum products have increased dramatically over the past 24 months. As shown in Table 1, prices have more than doubled from 2004 levels with the sharpest increase in 2006. Many people wonder why this has happened and who or what is to blame. Some speculate high crude oil prices are the result of price gauging or market manipulation; others theorize the high level of control over conventional oil reserves is a reason for the increase in price while still others site international political events such as nuclear development in Iran, the gulf war in Iraq, anti-American sentiment in Venezuela, and civil strife in Nigeria. Additional factors mentioned include natural disasters, infrastructure issues, or energy and environmental legislation which impact both crude oil and refined petroleum products prices.

U.S. Spot Prices of Crude Oil in $/Bbl
Source: Petroleum Navigator, Spot Prices, EIA, 2006

Economic theory teaches price is a function of supply and demand: when supplies decrease and demand increases, prices increase. As with any commodity, crude oil prices are largely influenced by these market forces. The following discussion touches on these issues, but argues that the major cause for higher crude oil prices is simply that, in key regions, there is concern that supplies cannot keep up with rapidly growing demand. Biofuels present an opportunity to reduce our reliance on crude oil and petroleum products by providing a domestic energy source.

Pressure On Prices
Tables 2 and 3, illustrate trends in crude oil production and consumption over the period 1980 to 2005 for the leading oil producing and consuming nations. At first glance, these data do not explain the recent surge in crude oil prices. However, looking beyond the data recent developments in both oil producing and consuming nations have caused concern in commodity markets resulting in price increases.

Top 15 Countries, Crude Oil Production 1980 - 2005 (1,000 Bbl/d)
* Russia data prior to 1989 represent production for all of U.S.S.R.
Source: International Energy Annual 2003, Table G2, EIA; 2006 International Petroleum Monthly, Table 11.b, EIA

Top 10 Countries, Crude Oil Consumption 1980 - 2005 (1,000 Bbl/d)
* Russia data prior to 1989 represent demand for all of U.S.S.R.
Source: International Energy Annual 2003, Table 1.2, EIA; 2006 International Petroleum Monthly, Table 1.7, EIA

As shown in Table 2, the majority of the countries which have experienced periods of political and social unrest have also experienced declines in oil production. A few key points:

  • Iraq's sporadic oil production which was largely due to the consequences of the Gulf War in 1990 as well as the ongoing effort to establish a democracy.
  • Venezuela's recent decrease in production has occured at the same time President Hugo Chavez has: encouraged socialist governments in South America, lobbied OPEC to reduce oil production, and forced petroleum sector private-public partnerships and profit sharing within Venezuela.
  • Iran's recent decision to pursue nuclear capabilities has futures markets wary of international oil sanctions or reduced production capacity.2
  • Crude reserves among world oil suppliers such as Saudi Arabia are not increasing at rates seen in past decades.
Moreover, OPEC has made little or no investment in oil production capacity in recent years and the productivity of investments in non-OPEC production areas has declined. Even though world oil production has increased at a steady pace since 1980, all of the above incidents help cause speculation and affect oil prices in commodity markets. U.S. vulnerability to world oil markets is exacerbated by an increase in U.S. dependence on oil imports, which has climbed to approximately 60 percent of its total crude oil consumption.

U.S. crude oil production has declined steadily over the past ten years. This was further exacerbated by the 2004 and 2005 hurricanes in the Gulf Coast Region. The Minerals Management Service reports that for the period August 26, 2005 through June 1, 2006, cumulative shut-in oil production was equivalent to 29.67 percent of the yearly production of oil in the Gulf of Mexico. Although substantial improvement has been made in reconstruction of the Gulf Coast oil production infrastructure, the impact of the 2004 and 2005 hurricanes has had a significant impact on crude oil supply and prices.3

Top 10 Countries, Net Crude Oil Importers, 2004*
*Table includes all countries that imported more than one million Bbl/d net in 2004.
Source: Crude Oil and Total Petroleum Imports Top 15 Countries, March 2006 Import Highlights: Released on May 25, 2006, EIA

Uncertainty in future supplies has also worked in conjunction with demand increases to force higher prices for crude oil. With the exception of Germany, all of the countries in Table 3 exhibited steady growth in crude oil consumption over the past 10 to 15 years. Germany's consumption declined due to strategic investments in alternative energy such as wind and biodiesel. India and China have shown high sustained growth in energy demand, and are recent additions to the list of top ten countries importing crude oil.

China and India are the most populous countries in the world and are also among the countries with the fastest growing economies. This economic growth is fueling a rapid increase in energy consumption, particularly fossil fuels. As illustrated in Table 5, the rate of growth in oil consumption in China and India has conspicuosly outpaced the rest of the world. In fact, China and India alone account for about one-third of the total world increase in oil demand over the period 1995 to 2005. Their combined average annual rate of growth is nearly 7 percent compared to less than 2 percent for the rest of the world.

China and India Outpace World Growth in Oil Demand
Source: International Energy Annual 2003, Table 1.2, EIA; 2006 International Petroleum Monthly, Table 1.7, EIA

Over the same period, petroleum product demand has increased dramatically. This is demonstrated by increased inputs of crude oil to refineries. The result is tighter gasoline supplies and higher prices. Similarly, U.S. refinery capacity has remained nearly unchanged in recent years and utilization rates continue to be at near capacity. This, combined with high prices of crude oil feedstocks, has translated into higher prices for all petroleum products such as motor gasoline and diesel fuel.

The Biofuels Solution
As prices continue to rise alternative solutions must be pursued. Biofuels offer a solution in which some countries have already begun to successfully implement.

  • In the U.S., biofuels are a key component of the President's Advanced Energy Initiative and will help to reduce 30 percent of 2004 levels of gasoline consumption by 2030. The U.S. is currently the world's second largest producer of ethanol at 4.28 billion gallons, accounting for 44.5 percent of world ethanol production.4
  • Brazil has been successful in supplying its fuel needs through sugarcane-to-ethanol. In 2005, Brazil produced 4.36 billion gallons of fuel ethanol, 45.2 percent of the world's total. Ethanol provides roughly 40 percent of Brazil's non-diesel fuel and 2 to 3 percent of U.S. non-diesel fuel.
  • Biodiesel, produced mainly from rapeseed or sunflower seed, comprises 80 percent of Europe's total biofuel production. The EU accounted for nearly 89 percent of all biodiesel production worldwide in 2005. Germany has been very successful integrating biodiesel into its transportation sector, producing 1.9 billion liters, or more than half the world total.5
  • As of early 2006, Columbia is mandating the use of 10 percent ethanol in all gasoline sold in cities with populations exceeding 500,000.
  • In Canada, the government aims for 45 percent of the country's gasoline consumption to contain 10 percent ethanol by 2010.
Biofuels will help foster a new transportation infrastructure, domestic energy production, rural economic growth and increased energy security. Biofuels also offer a greener alternative, through reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Continued development of biofuels will provide a path for long-term sustainable development in the United States.

1The United States peak oil production was in the late 1970s.
2An important note is that although the United States has not purchased oil from Iran since the government enacted sanctions in the early 1990s the events in Iran affect world oil prices which U.S. consumers must absorb.
3The News Room. Release: #3521, Minerals Management Service, http://www.mms.gov/ooc/press/2006/press0605.htm, June 5, 2006
4Biofuels for Transportation: Selected Trends and Facts, World Watch Institute, http://www.worldwatch.org/node/4081, June 9, 2006.
5Biofuels for Transportation: Selected Trends and Facts, World Watch Institute, http://www.worldwatch.org/node/4081, June 9, 2006.


BACK TO TOP


State Spotlight: Mississippi
Mississippi   In 2001 the state of Mississippi consumed roughly 1,173 trillion Btu of energy. The majority of consumption came from petroleum and natural gas accounting for 41 percent and 29 percent of the total energy consumption respectively, with coal accounting for the next highest amount with 17 percent. Nuclear and biomass accounted for 8 and 5 percent of the total consumption respectively. Hydroelectric and other energy sources each accounted for less than one half of one percent.1

Energy Profile Approximately 17,930,978 annual dry tons of biomass is available in Mississippi for energy production. Of this, urban wood wastes have the potential to supply 784,719 dry tons per year. Urban wood wastes include yard trimmings, wood packaging, and other miscellaneous household and commercial wood wastes. Forest residues consisting of logging residues, salvable dead wood, and small pole trees and saplings, have the potential to provide up to 1,774,600 annual dry tons. Up to 37,877 dry tons per year of agricultural residues are potentially available in the state, including materials such as corn stover and wheat straw. Finally, mill residues, consisting of bark and other residues from pulping mills, could provide up to 6,029,000 dry tons of biomass each year. There is an estimated 9,304,782 dry tons available of dedicated energy crops in Mississippi. Currently, dedicated energy crops are not produced in Mississippi, but could if they could be sold at a price ensuring producers a profit at least as high as could be earned using the land for alternative uses such as producing traditional agricultural crops.2

Biomass Potential by Source The Mississippi Biomass Council (MBC) offers a forum to share information for the purpose of assessing the biomass energy and fuel resources within the state, facilitating the utilization of biomass technology, and encouraging biomass related economic development. Council membership includes representatives from agriculture, forestry, recycling, power generation, state and local government agencies, higher education, research, and manufacturing and individuals interested in reducing the biomass waste stream or increasing economic opportunities for biomass. MBC was created in 1998 and incorporated in 2000 as a nonprofit corporation.3

Total Biomass Potential At this time the state of Mississippi is offering only one financial incentive to encourage the use of biomass energy sources and it is a state loan program for the commercial and industry sectors.4

1Energy Information Administration. Table 7: Energy Consumption Estimates by Source, 1960-2001, Mississippi. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_use/total/use_tot_ms.html (6/14/06).
2Biomass Feedstock Availability in the United States: 1999 State Level Analysis. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Updated January 2000. http://bioenergy.ornl.gov/resourcedata/index.html (6/14/06). *Note: $50/dry ton cost data was used in this article.
3Mississippi Biomass Council. http://ms-biomass.org/ (6/14/06).
4DSIRE: Incentives by state: Mississippi. http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/map2.cfm?State=MS&CurrentPageId=1 (5/9/06).

BACK TO TOP

 
On the Hill

Bill # Sponsor Description Last Action
H.R. 5259 Rep Berry, Marion [AR-1] Biobased Fuel Action Plan Act of 2006: To require the Biomass Research and Development Board to prepare a biobased fuel action plan to increase the use in the United States of biobased fuel as a ground transportation fuel. 5/2/2006: Referred to House Science
H.R. 5208 Rep Nussle, Jim [IA-1] Independence from Oil with Agriculture Act of 2006: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain tax incentives for alternative energy, to amend the Clean Air Act to accelerate the use of renewable fuels, and for other purposes. 4/26/2006: Referred to House Energy and Commerce
H. R. 5395 Rep Israel, Steve [NY-2] Energy Freedom Bonds Act of 2006: To authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to issue Energy Freedom Bonds to finance programs to facilitate the research, development, and deployment of clean renewable energy technologies. 5/16/2006: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
H.R.5372 Rep Herseth, Stephanie [SD] Bioenergy Innovation, Optional Fuel Utilization, and Energy Legacy (BIOFUEL) Act of 2006: To promote the increased utilization of domestically produced, renewable, biobased motor vehicle fuel supplies and the increased manufacture of flexible-fuel vehicles in the United States, and for other purposes. 5/19/2006: Introductory remarks on measure. (CR E904-905).
H.R.5301 Rep Israel, Steve [NY-2] Clean Energy Partnership Act of 2006: To provide for the establishment by the Secretary of Energy of a program of Federal support for local governments and school districts that establish comprehensive clean energy plans. 5/24/2006: Referred to the Subcommittee on Education Reform.
S.2571 Sen Conrad, Kent [ND] BOLD Energy Act of 2006: To promote energy production and conservation, and for other purposes. 4/6/2006: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
H.R.5331 Rep Pomeroy, Earl [ND] BOLD Energy Act of 2006: To promote energy production and conservation, and for other purposes. 5/9/2006: Referred to House Science
S.2829 Sen Cantwell, Maria [WA] Clean EDGE Act of 2006: To reduce the addiction of the United States to oil, to ensure near-term energy affordability and empower American families, to accelerate clean fuels and electricity, to provide government leadership for clean and secure energy, to secure a reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy future, and for other purposes. 5/17/2006: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
S.2993 Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] Strategic Energy Fund Act of 2006: A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a temporary oil profit fee and to use the proceeds of the fee collected to provide a Strategic Energy Fund and expand certain energy tax incentives, and for other purposes. 5/23/2006: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

BACK TO TOP


Grassroots


Quest for Energy Alternatives Steps Up
Current energy research explores a variety of technologies, including hybrid vehicles, solar power, and the widespread search for viable large-scale domestic production of a biobased fuel. Full article Full article

Sempra's SDG&E Unit to Purchase Biomass Power
Sempra Energy's San Diego Gas & Electric subsidiary said it will purchase 20 megawatts of biomass electricity generated by tree trimmings and other waste. Bull Moose Energy LLP, a San Diego-based energy producer, will gasify waste material at a power plant expected to be located in San Diego County. The plant will operate a clean burning system to divert several hundred tons of waste a day from landfills, the utility said. The price of the power was not disclosed. The purchases will begin in 2008 and supply electricity for 13,000 homes. SDG&E serves 3.4 million people in San Diego and Orange counties. Full article Full article

Demand for Ethanol Puts Businesses Back on Track: Nation's Thirst for the Fuel Spurs Railroad Use
Iowa's booming ethanol industry will make a record 1.3 billion gallons of fuel this year, creating a surging demand for railroad service to haul the product to gasoline markets across the country. Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe have seen shipments soar, and they and other rail companies are scrambling to keep up with the demand. Meanwhile, ethanol plants have received $1.14 million in state aid to connect with railroads and get their product to a nation thirsty for the alternative fuel. Full article Full article

New Storm-protection Products Are Hot
The onset of the 2006 hurricane season means business for Florida-area dealers of home-protection products. This year, soy-based insulation joins traditional plywood and other petroleum-based plastic options for battening the hatches. Full article Full article

USDA Scientists Help Create Metalworking Lube from Soy Oil
A biodegradable metalworking fluid derived from soybean oil is earning high marks in trials by Alcoa Inc. Alcoa, based in Pittsburgh, Pa., is conducting the trials under a five-year research and development agreement involving a team led by USDA chemist Sevim Erhan at the National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Peoria. Full article Full article

Oil Giant Chevron Gives Biofuels a Try: New Business Unit Explores Ethanol, Biodiesel, as Environmentalists Warn of 'Greenwashing'
Chevron Corp., the nation's second-largest oil company, wants a piece of the biofuel business. San Ramon's Chevron reported Wednesday that it has created a business unit to devise new ways to make ethanol and biodiesel, which are derived from organic sources such as corn, soybeans and vegetable oil. Full article Full article


BACK TO TOP


Marketplace


The Grain Prices graph shows the cost of soybeans, the main biodiesel feedstock, and corn, the main ethanol feedstock. The tables show actual grain prices, indicators which may affect gasoline prices, and the production of ethanol. Fuel prices come from OPIS Ethanol and Biodiesel Report. Ethanol and RBOB Unl New York spot prices and SME Biodiesel Rack, Chicago, March 2006.
U.S. Cash Grain Prices June 2006 Transportation Fuel Prices 2006 Transportation Fuel Prices
Grain Prices May 2005 May 2006 % Change
Corn 1.99 2.17
9%
Soybean 6.20 5.62 -9%
Fuel Supply May 2005 May 2006 % Change
Percent Refinery Utilization 94.2 90.3 -4.12%
Production by Product - Finished Motor Gasoline (Million Barrels) 8,997.5 9,124.8 1.41%
Stocks - Finished Motor Gasoline (Million Barrels) 142.7 116.6 -18.30%
Imports - Total Motor Gasoline (Million Barrels) 1,048.5 1,569.3 49.67%
Oxygenate Production March 2005 March 2006 % Change
Ethanol Production
(Million Barrels)
243 301 19.27%
MTBE Production
(Million Barrels)
129 98 -31.63%

Data Sources:
U.S. DOE-Energy Information Administration, "Weekly Petroleum Status Report", "Monthly Oxygenate Report"
USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service, "Agricultural Prices," "Grain Stocks"

U.S. Historic Imports of Motor Gasoline U.S. Historic Finished Motor Gasline Products U.S. Historic Refinery Utilization U.S. Historic Stocks of Finished Motor Gasoline

BACK TO TOP


R&D Awards

No R&D Awards were granted for this month.


BACK TO TOP

Solicitations
Title: Continuing Solicitation for the Office of Science
Description: Seeking grant applications for support of basic energy science fundamental research in the natural sciences and engineering leading to new and improved energy technologies and to understanding and mitigating the environmental impacts of energy technologies.
Government Agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science
Schedule: Applications may be submitted at any time.
URL: http://www.science.doe.gov/grants/FAPN05-01.html

Title: Biomass Research and Development Initiative
Description: Part V. A. 1. Initial Review Criteria and Part V. A. 2. Merit Review Criteria have been changed to 1) provide clarification regarding the requirement for 700 dry metric tonnes per day of feedstock and the requirement on feedstocks and 2) reflect a change in the merit review process. Additionally, Part VI. B. 2. Special Terms and Conditions and National Policy Requirements has been changed with the addition of validation criteria. See Amendment 002 in its entirety for further information.
Government Agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Golden Field Office
Schedule: Applications due by June 16, 2006
URL: https://e-center.doe.gov/iips/faopor.nsf/

Title: National Research Initiative
Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture requests applications for the National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (NRI). NRI supports research, extension, and education projects that address key problems of national, regional, and multi-state importance in sustaining all components of agriculture. 29 program areas identified including Biobased Products and Bioenergy Production; Water and Watersheds; and Rural Development.
Government Agency: USDA
Schedule: Due dates range from November 30, 2005 go October 31, 2006
URL:http://www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/nri/nri.html

Title: Biorefinery Construction Solicitation
Description: This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is being issued under authorization of the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005, Section 932. Amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 within Title XIII, Energy Policy Tax Incentives cited in EPAct and sections 1345 and 1346 (renewable fuel and biodiesel credits) of EPAct provide additional impetus and credit enhancements for potential applicants to respond to this announcement. Approximately $53,000,000 is expected to be available in FY07 for new awards under this FOA. Additional funding is expected to be available in FY08 and FY09. In total, approximately $160,000,000 over three years is expected to be available for new awards under this FOA.
Government Agency: DOE
Schedule: Applications due by September 10, 2006
URL: http://e-center.doe.gov/iips/faopor.nsf/


BACK TO TOP


Events

June 15-26, 2006
Nahalal, Israel

Strategic Planning and Management of Energy Organization
Organizer: EPAC
Contact: Shoshi Norman
Email: International_Department@galilcol.ac.il
Tel: 972 4 9837444
Website: http://www.galilcol.ac.il/

June 16-18, 2006
Onekama, Michigan

Michigan First Renewable Energy Fair
Organizer: Great Lakes Renewable Energy Association
Contact: Allan O'Shea
Email: N/A
Tel: 1-888-624-1324
Website: http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/

June 16-18, 2006
St. Bonnet-de-Joux, France

Euroforest 2006
Organizer: CFBL
Contact: N/A
Email: info@aprovalbois.com
Tel: N/A
Website: http://www.euroforest2006.com/

June 20-23, 2006
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

International Fuel Ethanol Workshop & Expo
Organizer: BBI International
Contact: N/A
Email: conferences@bbibiofuels.com
Tel: 719-539-0300
Website: http://www.fuelethanolworkshop.com/

June 21-23, 2006
Potsdam, New York

2006 Bioenergy and Rural Economic Development Conference
Organizer: North Country Bioenergy
Contact: Christina Lesyk
Email: info@ncbioenergy.org
Tel: 315-268-3943
Website: http://www.ncbioenergy.org

June 23-25, 2006
Custer, Wisconsin

17th Renewable Energy and Sustainable Living Fair
Organizer: Midwest Renewable Energy Association
Contact: N/A
Email: info@the-mrea.org
Tel: 715-592-6595
Website: http://www.the-mrea.org/energy_fair.php

June 23-26, 2006
Detroit, Michigan

Earth Race
Organizer: EarthRace Charitable Trust
Contact: N/A
Email: N/A
Tel: +64 21 415 342
Website: http://www.earthrace.net

June 28, 2006
London, United Kingdom

Kyoto - At What Price?
Organizer: IEE
Contact: Dorothee Archambault
Email: events@theiet.org
Tel: +44 (0) 1438 767295
Website: http://www.iee.org/Events/kyoto.cfm

June 28-29, 2006
Houston, Texas

Biodiesel Investor (2nd annual)
Organizer: Platts
Contact: Ron Berg
Email: ron_berg@platts.com
Tel: 781-860-6118
Website: http://www.platts.com/Events/PC625/


Click here for additional bio-related events.

BACK TO TOP

The Biomass Initiative, formed as part of the Biomass R&D Act of 2000, is a multi-agency effort to coordinate and accelerate all Federal biobased products, biofuels, and bioenergy research and development. The Biomass Initiative distributes an online monthly newsletter to inform government institutions and the public, including private companies, about the Biomass Initiative and biomass-related activities. The newsletter’s contents include a feature article highlighting important biomass-related stories of the month, as well as grassroots information and a state spotlight recognizing important local activities. In addition, the newsletter includes biomass-related information on recent legislation, R&D awards, solicitations, and market trends.

If you have any questions or comments about the Biomass Initiative Newsletter, please contact mmanella@bcs-hq.com.